Impending FHA Guidelines Propel Reverse Mortgage Industry Forward
The Federal Housing Authority's Financial Assessment goes into effect on April 27 and will alter home equity conversion mortgage underwriting procedures to resemble those of forward mortgages. Senior
borrowers will now have to prove, with more documentation and
paperwork, that they can handle the ongoing property costs to qualify
for a reverse mortgage. The financial assessment will be a positive
change overall for the reverse mortgage industry because in taking on
many of the practices used in forward mortgage lending, and slowing down
the reverse mortgage application, more defaults will be prevented.
Forward mortgage practices should
have been conducted all along by the reverse mortgage industry. When
the only ongoing financial requirement that a reverse mortgage borrower
has to pay attention to by virtue of the mortgage agreement are taxes
and insurance, it doesn't make sense that the industry wouldn't prove
that borrowers have the residual income to be able to pay those costs.
Now that calculating residual income is required by law under the
financial assessment, senior potential borrowers can better decide
whether they are viable candidates for such a loan.
Reverse lenders can also now protect themselves through
the requirement known as the Life Expectancy Set-Aside which, similar
to an escrow account, earmarks funds to pay for property taxes and
insurance over the course of the loan.
In
addition to changes to practice through policy, lenders should also
reevaluate three key business areas that affect how senior borrowers are
served.
Hiring and maintaining skilled staff members — and paying them what they are worth —
to handle the changes and continue to perform successfully without
interruption is another seemingly obvious best practice but sadly it is
an area that needs more attention. This industry has a tendency to
underpay valuable employees in order to cut internal costs. While this
might appear to positively affect the bottom line in the short-term,
appropriate compensation and higher retention of skilled employees is
much more cost-and time-effective in the long run. If loan officer
compensation does not grow to meet his or her value, eventually these
team members will leave for better opportunities. It is not beneficial
to lenders to spend time and money training and educating the
competition's future employees.
The
relationship between the loan officer and borrower in the beginning is
critical, and lenders training their loan officers to be comforting,
helpful and communicative are lenders who are most successful when
helping borrowers through the new requirement's process. Remaining
sensitive to older borrowers' personality types and coaching loan
officers to compensate for potential delays by planning strategically —
for example, when collecting documents from borrowers — maintains
efficiency and enhances productivity.
Improving operational processes is equally important when adapting to the financial assessment requirements.
Lenders should eliminate any potential bottlenecks to the process by
conducting routine efficiency audits and identifying any areas for
improvement. Enhancing efficiency during the loan origination process is
essential to maintaining profitable operations in a period of
transition.
Last,
the right technology carries most of the weight of the new required
changes for the lender. Rather than rely on man-hours to accommodate the
additional required steps of verifying borrower eligibility,
calculating income after property insurance payments and taxes and
verifying credit history.
The
new financial assessment requirements pose a challenge, but they are
necessary to the sustainability of the reverse mortgage industry.
Healthy adoption of the policies, and some of the solid forward mortgage
processes, will only propel the reverse mortgage industry into the
future.
Alice Sorenson is an executive vice president at LRES.



No comments:
Post a Comment